Levy Firestone Muse partner Daren H. Firestone shares his thoughts on Julian Assange’s recent indictment, including its relation to the Espionage Act and Supreme Court precedent in a detailed editorial for Bloomberg Law:
The Department of Justice has not used the 1917 Espionage Act to indict a member of the media for publishing classified information since the 1940s. Recent charges against Julian Assange may put this practice to the test.
Read Daren’s full post, “Will Assange’s Indictment Erode Freedom of the Press?,” on Bloomberg Law.
Levy Firestone Muse partner Joshua Levy is quoted in a detailed look at House Democrat subpoenas served on the Trump administration and its affiliates, including Donald Trump’s personal accounting firm, Mazars USA:
Joshua Levy, a lawyer for Fusion who argued the case, said Trump faces an uphill battle to block the Mazars subpoena. “Courts defer to Congress’ representation of what lies within the legitimate legislative sphere and are reluctant to interfere in a congressional investigation,” Levy said.
Read the full post, “Democrats look to courts as White House stonewalls on subpoenas,” on CNN.com.
In a fact-checking analysis by Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post, Levy Firestone Muse partner Joshua A. Levy offers comments on the Mueller Report’s substantiation of the Steele dossier, which was prepared by British intelligence officer Christopher Steele in 2016:
The Mueller Report substantiates the core reporting and many of the specifics in Christopher Steele’s 2016 memoranda, including that Trump campaign figures were secretly meeting Kremlin figures, that Russia was conducting a covert operation to elect Donald Trump, and that the aim of the Russian operation was to sow discord and disunity in the U.S. and within the Transatlantic Alliance… To our knowledge, nothing in the Steele memoranda has been disproven.
Read the full Washington Post analysis, “What the Steele dossier said vs. what the Mueller report said,” for a detailed breakdown of how the two documents compare.
In representing Glenn Simpson, the CEO of Fusion GPS (the organization that commissioned the Christopher Steele dossier), Levy Firestone Muse partner Joshua A. Levy was featured on MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show.
Mr. Levy’s comments after Mr. Simpson had already testified to three Senate intelligence committees were broadcast and discussed by Rachel Maddow on Wednesday, October 17:
In 2016, our clients, Glenn Simpson, and Fusion GPS, did their civic duty by providing credible information to the Justice Department that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election here. . . Since that time, the US intelligence community under this administration and the bipartisan Senate Select Committee agreed and found that Russia not only interfered with our 2016 presidential election, but that Vladimir Putin led an effort to help elect Donald J. Trump president.
This committee has shown no interest in the fact that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. Rather than do its duty, consistent with its traditional and constitutional role, the House Judiciary Committee has looked the other way at White House efforts to influence and interfere with the Justice Department’s investigation of this administration. . .
The Russians tried to elect Donald Trump president—it’s been proven. . . The big picture is that a foreign hostile power was trying to interfere in our democracy, in our presidential election.
Visit MSNBC.com to watch the full clip, “Dossier nit-pickers miss the big picture,” complete with Rachel Maddow’s commentary.
Levy Firestone Muse partner Josh Levy has filed a complaint to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board on behalf of several Washington D.C. citizens—including retired judges and religious leaders—that articulates why President Trump’s license to serve beer, wine, and liquor at his establishments in the District should be revoked.
In a Washington Post op-ed, Colbert I. King writes about the complaint and its significance:
When I first wrote about the complaint against Trump on July 6, a few readers dismissed the issue as trivial, a nuisance — a case of a mosquito biting an elephant’s hide. I disagree. This case matters, if the rule of law is to have any meaning.
Read more: Trump’s booze, beer and wine fate rests in D.C.’s hands
In a Washington Post op-ed, Bob Muse is quoted sharing his thoughts regarding U.S. courts’ ability to protect the Mueller investigation from presidential interference:
“Just as with Sirica, it’s improbable that the chief judge of the district court will sit idly by and watch the president corrupt the system,” argues Robert Muse, a prominent defense lawyer and former member of the Senate Watergate Committee.
Read more: How the courts — not Congress — could protect Mueller’s investigation
KIGALI, RWANDA—The Government of Rwanda retained a team of lawyers and investigators at Levy Firestone Muse LLP, led by Bob Muse, Josh Levy and Daren Firestone to examine publicly available information on the role of French officials in the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi.
That examination culminated in the Muse Report, which can be found here. The Muse Report of December 11, 2017, recommends that based on the publicly available information, a full investigation into the role of French government and military officials in the Genocide against the Tutsi is fully warranted. Rwanda has accepted the recommendation, and Levy Firestone Muse will be conducting this investigation, on behalf of the Rwandan government.
Read the Muse Report
Best Lawyers today released the 2016 Best Lawyers in America list, and Levy Firestone Muse LLP is pleased to announce the inclusion of Robert F. Muse under “Criminal Defense: White-Collar” and “Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs.”
Best Lawyers is the oldest and most highly-respected peer review guide to the legal profession worldwide. Its Best Lawyers in America list, currently in its 23rd edition, can be viewed in its entirety on the Best Lawyers website.
Levy Firestone Muse Partner Joshua Levy is quoted in an article at Government Executive on how federal employees at large might view the threat of a contempt of Congress citation against a former tax official involved in the investigation into the Internal Revenue Service’s alleged targeting of Tea Party groups.
Read the full article at GovExec.com